Sean Wallbridge, SharePoint MVP


RSS Feed Feed your read!

The Lowdown

Sean's Resume
itgroove (Victoria, BC)
Major Change
Beer Me! (Donate)
Sean's SharePoint Ditty
About Sean
SharePoint Best Practices
Recommended Reading
Follow me on Twitter
Aggregated MVP Blogs

Search

Archives

August 2010 (4)
July 2010 (6)
June 2010 (4)
May 2010 (16)
April 2010 (20)
March 2010 (11)
February 2010 (3)
January 2010 (4)
December 2009 (6)
November 2009 (5)
October 2009 (14)
September 2009 (15)
August 2009 (11)
July 2009 (14)
June 2009 (20)
May 2009 (19)
April 2009 (22)
March 2009 (20)
February 2009 (19)
January 2009 (13)
December 2008 (8)
November 2008 (16)
October 2008 (16)
September 2008 (16)
August 2008 (11)
July 2008 (5)
June 2008 (8)
May 2008 (14)
April 2008 (18)
March 2008 (31)
February 2008 (13)
January 2008 (10)
December 2007 (4)
November 2007 (2)
October 2007 (9)
September 2007 (10)
August 2007 (4)
July 2007 (10)
June 2007 (7)
May 2007 (13)
April 2007 (8)
March 2007 (1)
February 2007 (2)
January 2007 (11)
December 2006 (2)
November 2006 (10)
October 2006 (7)
September 2006 (5)
August 2006 (6)
July 2006 (5)
June 2006 (5)
May 2006 (5)
April 2006 (7)
March 2006 (2)
February 2006 (3)
January 2006 (9)
December 2005 (4)
November 2005 (19)
October 2005 (6)
September 2005 (15)
July 2005 (5)
June 2005 (3)
May 2005 (4)

Links

itgroove Website
BrainLitter Archive
SharePoint Team Blog
Sean's SharePoint Ditty
WSS 3.0 Builds
MOSS 2007 Builds
MVP Profile
MCP Virtual Transcript
2010 Product Comparison

Tag Cloud

Active Directory, ASP.NET, Best Practices, CKS Enhanced Blog Edition, Exchange, From the Brain, IIS, ISA, itgroove, MOSS 2007, Outlook, Rants, Response Point, SBS, Security, SharePoint, SharePoint 2010, SharePoint Designer, SQL Server, Terminal Services, Toronto Maple Leafs, VMware, Web Litter, Windows, Windows 7, Windows Server 2008, Windows Vista, WSS 3.0,

Hosted SharePoint vs. SharePoint in House – One Perspective 

Tags: MOSS 2007, SharePoint, SharePoint 2010, SharePoint Designer, WSS 3.0

SharePoint is Awesome - Whether it be Hosted or In House.

 

The following Pro/Con list has been created to give our customers what we believe to be the essential details to make an informed choice about whether to implement SharePoint "In House" on new or existing server equipment, or to implement SharePoint with a hosted provider.

 

I sent this around the office and to some respected colleagues and the general comment was that it seemed like we were trying to sway customers away from hosting and really, that isn't true (we offer hosting, for clients that want it). In the end, I'm leaving it as is as there are Pro's and Con's of each SharePoint implementation option and I'd rather include all of the points, than remove details, just to make the sides 'even'.

 

 

Itgroove (www.itgroove.net) can provide hosted SharePoint (WSS) and/or provide complete installation, configuration and support of your In House SharePoint platform.

 

 
Posted by Sean Wallbridge on 20-Aug-09
Bookmark this post with:        
 

Comments


Tom Naramore commented on Friday, 21-Aug-2009
ABP has been hosting WSS for Public and Private clients since 2001 (Team Services). Our hosted clients (users and IT) have full time jobs outside of learning, supporting, training, optimizing, and customizing the needed SharePoint solutions. I think it should be noted that the list above is assuming the hosted client is still doing all of the above tasks of which our Client's do NONE. We provide; Single Sign on 3rd Party Apps Custom Code Shared and Dedicated systems State of the Art back up and DR. We don't sell access to the shell. We provide the Full Solution which empowers our Client's to focus on their jobs and increasing revenue. After 2.5 years hosting for a National Bank we migrated 100% of the solution into their NOC for them to manage. The above list speaks to only those hosted solutions that allow access for the client to do the work. Don't companies need the solution and effeciency, not the headache, learning curve and upfront investment? Just my .02


Sean Wallbridge commented on Friday, 21-Aug-2009
Hi Tom, Good points. I think where my point and yours differ, is that by hosting, I mean the "$50/month" providers that are out there, that provide hosting for a 'fixed/monthly' charge. I believe what you are getting at (which we also provide), is providing a dedicated SharePoint, "hosted solution" - one on closed gear, for that one client - in a custom "managed" fashion. My post is related to the "one size fits all" providers ... as many customers are coming to us saying "I want everything SharePoint provides, for $50/month like at online business X or Y" - and that just isn't possible to do, for that price. Thanks for the comments, and have a great weekend!

blog comments powered by Disqus